Saturday, March 4, 2017

Week 9 - Linda Nguyen

Linda Nguyen
ASA 189F, National Aesthetics
Professor Valverde
4 March 2017

Week 9 - March 6 and 8 - What is Viet Nam: Viet Nam’s Peoples and Lands
     I believe Vietnam country remade itself through the work of the Vietnamese Government and its people. The Vietnamese government recognizes the significance of links with overseas Vietnamese; thus the Vietnamese Government cultivate good relation with those Vietnamese living abroad and seeing them as a part of Vietnam’s growth economically and socially. In the past, it was difficult for Vietnamese students to study oversea due to strict government control. However, it is now easy for Vietnamese students to pursue their studies abroad. There were Vietnamese students studying overseas that were on government scholarships, as well as a majority of others who are studying abroad are self-funded. The government encourages many Vietnamese students to seek higher education abroad, where the opportunities exist overseas in hopes that they return and help with Vietnam’s economy. I think Vietnam remade itself by being open and recognizing the important role of Vietnamese diasporas’ contribution to the country’s development. For example, in 2004 the Resolution 36 was passed that created favorable conditions for Viet Kieu. These benefits include dual citizenship and permitting Viet Kieu to purchase property in Vietnam. This was a progressive move on the Government’s part and their willingness to engage with the diaspora.

     Vietnam can achieve maximum “national aesthetic” status by adopting practices from China and India, respectively. China government invest in their own country by creating affordable tuition fees and accommodations for their students. Moreover, China and India’s government invests in their country by focusing on high concentration in its technology and science sector that provide opportunities for their students to pursue innovative projects, respectively. Additionally, the Vietnamese Government should invest in their own country and invest in a high quality higher education (tertiary) in which there is much greater support for research and an environment that values collaboration between academia and industry that will lead to success in retaining Vietnamese students. Furthermore, the Vietnamese Government should foster stronger ties with oversea Vietnamese students and highly skilled expatriates abroad by creating a social and economic environment in the long run. For example, maintaining ties with its Vietnamese students’ diaspora and informing them of opportunities in Vietnam such as up-to-date information on business, employment opportunities and Vietnamese labor market; academic exchanges; and information on legal topics (i.e. as buying property and starting up a business) as they arise. Moreover, having channels of communication to be used to promote investment, employment and research opportunities that will lead to greater engagement with the Vietnamese student diaspora and increased levels of return migration. The Vietnamese Government does not do a good job of acknowledging and valuing oversea students’ international qualifications and experiences. The Vietnamese Government’s lack of concern for students thus sends a wrong message to overseas Vietnamese students and discourages them from returning home or maintaining professional ties with Vietnam. Vietnamese Government should make a concerted effort to facilitate Vietnamese students of their return because their return or professional engagement is essential to their home country’s economic and social development.

     It is important and valuable to know the culture of the country like Bhutan that my group and I are branding so that there would be no cultural misunderstanding. Respecting the culture of the country of Bhutan will we be able to build a relationship with and work with the Bhutanese locals, the Bhutanese Government, or the Bhutanese traveling agency. By learning and knowing about the culture of Bhutan will help me better understand what the country of Bhutan wants in terms of the products that I am branding to them. Understanding Bhutan’s culture, language, and way of thinking and doing things will help me better understand and make my product better in branding the country. Additionally, the product that I am branding will cater to the Bhutanese’s people (out of their respect) and cater to people in the U.S. who can relate to spirituality with respect to Bhutanese’s culture. In other words, this will help me better understand Bhutan in knowing my business model being developed through the social media. Just knowing about the country and what the Bhutanese want would help our product in serving them and helping them. Understanding Bhutan would help me understand certain region or district and have an opportunity to learn about the country and create a better project of spirituality. The value of knowing the culture of Bhutan will give me a window of opportunity to build the relationship and build trust with Bhutanese people.

In relation to the theme of the week and current events outside of class, Bhutan is an example. The country’s development is guided by a Five-Year Plan issued by the National Gross Happiness Commission (GNHC). The measurement of success of governance in Bhutan is to achieve Gross National Happiness (GNH). GNH is a priority and GNH exemplifies in remaking its country towards a holistic approach to development. According to the Huffington Post titled, Got Happiness? First UN International Day of Happiness (2013) by Frances Moore Lappe, “Gross National Happiness is a comprehensive approach to measuring well-being that includes not only psychological well-being but also eight other domains which include health, education, good governance, and ecological diversity and resilience.” The GNHC started the drafting of the 12th Plan and it will mostly focus on the development aspect of Bhutan, such as the people and systems and processes. Other development of Bhutan is women’s representation and participation in politics; Mongolia-Bhutan’s exchanges in democracies (and learning from each others’ experiences); a collaborative approach to democracy building and Bhutan’s democratic institution and processes (and government and other state institution to create systems and processes that adhere to democratic principles).

Question: What can we learn from countries like Vietnam’s people and land in relation to other countries?

Building sustainable democracy in Bhutan, 2016

Image citation: http://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/news/bhutan3.jpg

Bibliography
Adhy Aman. "News." Building Sustainable Democracy in Bhutan: Findings from International IDEA's High-level Visit | International IDEA. N.p., 11 Apr. 2016. Web. 04 Mar. 2017.
/.latest_citation_text

Cate Gribble. “National Policies on Skilled Labour and the Cross-border Student Market, with a Focus on Vietnam.”

Frances Moore Lappe. "Got Happiness? First UN International Day of Happiness." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 19 Mar. 2013. Web. 04 Mar. 2017.
/.latest_citation_text

Michael G. Palmer. “The Legacy of Agent Orange: Empirical Evidence from Central Vietnam.”
Excerpts from Andrew Rowan’s Manuscript.
Kieu-Linh Caroline Valverde. “Ao Dai: A Modern Design Coming of Age.”

No comments:

Post a Comment