Sunday, November 12, 2017

Week 8 - Riley Frederking




          Costa Rica is a popular destination, in 1993 “tourism became Costa Rica’s principal export . . . surpassing bananas” and has remained so for the most part (Jones 34). There has been a concentrated effort to promote and capitalized on green energy and ecotourism, “responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment and improves the well-being of local people” (Jones 2). In 2016 Costa Rica was national news when they announce their ability to “produce 98% of its electricity without oil” (Fendt). However, as with most things, “all that glitters is not green” and the desire to expand and capitalize on their image has had several negative results (Fendt). 
          In recent years, there has been an increase in demand for oil that parallels the “explosive growth in private vehicles” and “even the most ecologically sensitive international tourists still arrive by air” affecting not only pollution but undermining the efforts to decrease dependability on fossil fuels (Fendt; Jones 39). In addition, Costa Rica is experiencing adverse effects on the native ecosystems and human populations from excessive pesticide runoff into rivers and ground water from the banana and plantain farms (Polidoro 5983). There is also resistance and a lack of interest from many entrepreneurs only looking to capitalize resulting in an abundance of “‘greenwashing,’ or making false, opportunistic claims of environmental benefits” (Jones 37). 
           Sadly, Costa Rica’s efforts to increase and accommodate the flooding interest in their country, has not reached levels of quality sustainability. Although they are known for their ecofriendly practices and tourism, there is still a desperate need for improvement that requires Costa Rica to fully align their touted beliefs with their every day practices.


            One of the most valuable aspects of UC Davis Campus is the progressive thinking of many students. There is a true desire to see fundamental and radical changes to our broken patriarchal institutions, systems, and society. For our particular project, we have chosen to focus on empowering the female students at UC Davis. Thus, it is important to not exploit the personal and individual experiences of women on campus. It is critical that we ensure inclusion for groups that experience marginalization in context with dating violence and sexual harassment, too often the emphasis is placed on cisgender, heterosexual, and predominately white females. We should not assume that we can understand the feelings, emotions, and distinctive experiences of every single female on campus. It would be negligent of us to infer that we know the status of each student’s personal safety or their individual needs. Which is why Femme Fam leaves the decision up to each individual to asset their own needs and to merely provide an inclusive tool that they can choose, or not, to utilize.
            Lastly, Femme Fam has chosen to not exploit the very real and traumatic fear of sexual assault and violence for monetary gains. We therefore are committed to find creative ways to provide the application gratis. Femme Fam will not be a revenue based company. Our ultimate goal is not to make money, but attempt to make a measurable difference that reflects each unique experience of females at UC Davis.

Question: Is it logistically possible for a country to sustain conservation of the ecosystem while also attempting to radically expand and capitalize on exports and tourism?





“Esencial Costa Rica” The Costarican News. 4 September 2017. Digital Image.

Fendt, Lindsay. “All That Glitters Is Not Green: Costa Rica's Renewables Conceal Dependence on Oil.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 5 Jan. 2017

Jones, Geoffrey, and Andrew Spadafora. "Entrepreneurs and the Co-Creation of Ecotourism in Costa Rica." Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 16-136, June 2016.

Polidoro, Beth, and A. Morra. “An Ecological Risk Assessment of Pesticides and Fish Kills in the Sixaola Watershed, Costa Rica.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 23, no. 6, 2016, pp. 5983–5991.

No comments:

Post a Comment