In the realm of fashion, music, or
even architecture, the creators and stylists try to change with the times,
making that entity current. Pop culture often changes and sometimes it can be a
race to who can keep up. This phenomenon can also happen with countries and
their objective of becoming a world player. Japan is a wonderful example of
this strategic focus. Post World War II Japan had adopted the Yoshida Doctrine
which focused on economic rehabilitation, avoid international affairs with
light artillery, and provide bases on their land for the United States army,
navy, and air force. What was problematic with this doctrine was that it was
outdated, catering to a Japan that was newly stricken by war. However after
Japan was able to adapt to the Yoshida Doctrine’s objectives, it proved no
longer helpful for the new Japan that was created. It was in that time the
Koizumi Doctrine was adapted. The goals shifted from economic influence into
structural power, maintaining an economic distance against its competitors, the
“flying V” formation. In National Aesthetic, adopting with the times is
pertinent to a country’s successful branding. A country needs to be flexible
with what is current to the problems of the times. What I question is if these
doctrines are implemented through law and enforced even on a personal market
level?
Works Cited:
Tam Siew Man. “Japan’s Grand
Strategic Shift from Yoshida to Koizumi Reflections on Japan’s Strategic Focus
on the 21st Century”
No comments:
Post a Comment