Question: Identify
and explain the three characteristics that helped define Japan’s reconstruction
development plan post WWII.
Japan’s reconstruction plan emphasizes the intertwining
topics of international relations, economic growth and maintenance, and national
stability and security.
While under the Yoshida doctrine, Japan’s initial avoidance toward
international affairs allowed them to achieve economic stability post WWII.
However, Japan’s reliance on foreign resources established the importance of
international interdependence. The Koizumi doctrine led Japan to place more
representatives in international organizations and sign economic partnerships
with other nations, cementing its place as a contributor to international
affairs, increasing their worldly influence, and thus strengthening their
structural power. Because of their start as a very enclosed nation, I came to
appreciate their progression to a more cooperative stance.
Being the exporters of products from cars to electronics to menswear,
Japan’s exports are diverse and unique enough to be successfully distributed
internationally, but their processes of production are placed in different
regions in Japan to keep their technological expertise more exclusive. This maintains
their competitiveness in the global economy and their economic distance. Reforms
in education have also been made to encourage and train more citizens to contribute
to the technological industry and assist in maintaining Japan’s lead in that
field.
The ‘cultural purity’ that Japan initially experienced under
the Yoshida doctrine was a result of their defensive stance for national
security. But due to a ‘declining standard of living,’ the Koizumi doctrine
drove Japan to be more open to foreigners to assist in their workforce and
maintain decent conditions, and as a result, national tranquility (Mun, 2007) .
The concept of Copycat Modernity can be seen through Japan’s
copying of the American style and the formation of Japan’s own
American-influenced style, Ametora (Fernandez, 2015) . I also think that
Japan’s progression into a more cooperative and technologically advanced nation
is also evidence of this, being relatively more similar to hegemonically dominant
Western countries than before. Malaysia and other Asian countries utilize this concept
also, as described through the “flying geese” model (Mun, 2007) .
I found it interesting that most nations so far have desired
an image that is strictly theirs, while Japan’s method for revamping parts of
their image rested on copying another’s, especially since they had spent such a
long period of time focused on self-improvement.
Currently, Japan seems to be suffering from domestic issues
such as unsteady employment, which may contribute to falling birthrates due to being
able to support a family. Authorizing regulations or establishments that give
more job security and reasonable working conditions may help this part of the
population.
My Question:
Given that many nations seem to desire a more personalized
image, would establishing an image through ‘copycat’ methods harm more than
heal a nation, even if said methods were beneficial to a nation in certain domestic aspects?
I found it interesting and slightly amusing picturing troops
trained for battle building snow sculptures. I decided to satiate my curiosity
and look it up, and I was both surprised and impressed!
Sources:
Fernandez, C. (2015, December 2). How American Style
Fueled Postwar Youth Fashion in Japan. Fashionista.
Mun, T. S. (2007, January). Japan's Grand Strategic
Shift from Yoshida to Koizumi: Reflections on Japan's Strategic Focus in the
21st Century. pp. 117-136.
Semuels, Alana. “The Mystery of Why Japanese People Are Having So Few Babies.” The Atlantic, July 20, 2017. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/07/japan-mystery-low- birth-rate/534291/.
No comments:
Post a Comment