Question: Soft power seems beneficial on the surface, but can you find
instances, especially in the case of China, when it can be harmful for targeted
countries of interest?
Culture, politics, and
foreign policies. These three things are what define soft power. Soft power may
seem like a good thing but to targeted countries of interest, it may be
harmful. China is well known for scandals of homeopathic medicine, such as dried
seahorse and black-market rhino horn. People claim that these goods have
special powers, but this trade is frowned upon by many, giving China a negative
image. Especially so with the rhino horn industry, given the way the horn is
acquired.
Culture is important, without
it there is no draw for tourism. Politics must be within an acceptable range,
otherwise other countries will shun the given country. Lastly, foreign policies have to be
legitimate. With the illegal and unmoral industries in China, the foreign
policies are very illegitimate, as mentioned above. In the end, the soft power
is harmful, even for China.
Question: Can soft
power be used properly, or is it by definition, faulty?
http://connect2conserve.org/the-resistance-demand-for-rhino-horns/ |
Ding, Sheng. “Branding a Rising China: An Analysis of Beijing’s National Image
Management in the Age of China’s Rise.” Journal of Asian and African Studies, Apr. 2011
No comments:
Post a Comment